आईएसएसएन: 2472-5005

जर्नल ऑफ़ स्पीच पैथोलॉजी एंड थेरेपी

खुला एक्सेस

हमारा समूह 1000 से अधिक वैज्ञानिक सोसायटी के सहयोग से हर साल संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका, यूरोप और एशिया में 3000+ वैश्विक सम्मेलन श्रृंखला कार्यक्रम आयोजित करता है और 700+ ओपन एक्सेस जर्नल प्रकाशित करता है जिसमें 50000 से अधिक प्रतिष्ठित व्यक्तित्व, प्रतिष्ठित वैज्ञानिक संपादकीय बोर्ड के सदस्यों के रूप में शामिल होते हैं।

ओपन एक्सेस जर्नल्स को अधिक पाठक और उद्धरण मिल रहे हैं
700 जर्नल और 15,000,000 पाठक प्रत्येक जर्नल को 25,000+ पाठक मिल रहे हैं

में अनुक्रमित
  • गूगल ज्ञानी
  • जे गेट खोलो
  • RefSeek
  • हमदर्द विश्वविद्यालय
  • ईबीएससीओ एज़
  • यूरो पब
  • आईसीएमजेई
इस पृष्ठ को साझा करें

अमूर्त

Exploring the Effectiveness of Talking Mats as a Communication-Supporting Tool for Dementia Patients in Discharge Discussions: A Study

Angela Ross

Objective: Dementia patients’ communication skills deteriorate with time, which makes it difficult for them to participate in discussions about discharge. Communication issues might be plain to see. However, patients frequently lack a structured support. The purpose of this study was to find out if Talking Mats (TM), a visual communicationsupporting tool, might help patients communicate better at their discharge discussions.

Methods: Twenty patients were randomised to utilise TM prior to their discharge meeting (Talking Mats Group, TMG) or to follow the ward’s routine protocol (Control Group, CG) in a pilot research. Persons attending discharge meetings (patients, personal friends, nurses, and social care staff) in a geriatric unit judged how effectively they felt the patient participated in communication on a visual analogue scale. They also assessed the extent to which using TM had aided them.

Results: Our main finding was an interaction effect in how the four groups of people who attended the meeting (patients, close acquaintances, nurses, and social care workers) rated the three different statements about communication and participation; knowing the patient before the meeting affected ratings of the patient’s communicative participation. The majority of people who used TM said it was useful at the discharge talks. The comparison of groups produced the contradictory conclusion that CG communication was judged as more well-functioning than TMG communication.

Conclusion: While understanding each other is not always possible at discharge discussions, especially when a patient has cognitive impairment, the use of TM was rated as a communication facilitator by those present. Knowing a patient influenced communication ratings, and we concluded that it is preferable to have the person using the mat with the patient also attend the discharge meeting.