हमारा समूह 1000 से अधिक वैज्ञानिक सोसायटी के सहयोग से हर साल संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका, यूरोप और एशिया में 3000+ वैश्विक सम्मेलन श्रृंखला कार्यक्रम आयोजित करता है और 700+ ओपन एक्सेस जर्नल प्रकाशित करता है जिसमें 50000 से अधिक प्रतिष्ठित व्यक्तित्व, प्रतिष्ठित वैज्ञानिक संपादकीय बोर्ड के सदस्यों के रूप में शामिल होते हैं।
ओपन एक्सेस जर्नल्स को अधिक पाठक और उद्धरण मिल रहे हैं
700 जर्नल और 15,000,000 पाठक प्रत्येक जर्नल को 25,000+ पाठक मिल रहे हैं
Fatima Sheikh
Conventional breeding often requires decades to introduce a new feature into a crop, but recently developed genome sequence modification technology offers the potential to shorten this time. One of these cutting-edge breeding techniques uses CRISPR/Cas9, an RNA-directed DNA nuclease, to cut the genomic DNA in living organisms, making it easier to delete or insert sequences. Guide RNAs control this targeting based on certain sequences (gRNAs) [1]. But selecting the best gRNA sequence is not without its difficulties. Although many of them allow the use of plant genomes to identify potential off-target regions, almost all of the current gRNA design tools for usage in plants are based on data from animal experimentation. Here, we analyse the performance and predicted consistency of eight various online gRNA-site tools. Unfortunately, neither a statistically meaningful association between rankings and in vivo effectiveness, nor any agreement between the rankings produced by the various
algorithms. This indicates that significant gRNA performance and/or target site accessibility aspects in plants have not yet been clarified and taken into account by gRNA-site prediction algorithms [2].