आईएसएसएन: 2161-1165

महामारी विज्ञान: खुली पहुंच

खुला एक्सेस

हमारा समूह 1000 से अधिक वैज्ञानिक सोसायटी के सहयोग से हर साल संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका, यूरोप और एशिया में 3000+ वैश्विक सम्मेलन श्रृंखला कार्यक्रम आयोजित करता है और 700+ ओपन एक्सेस जर्नल प्रकाशित करता है जिसमें 50000 से अधिक प्रतिष्ठित व्यक्तित्व, प्रतिष्ठित वैज्ञानिक संपादकीय बोर्ड के सदस्यों के रूप में शामिल होते हैं।

ओपन एक्सेस जर्नल्स को अधिक पाठक और उद्धरण मिल रहे हैं
700 जर्नल और 15,000,000 पाठक प्रत्येक जर्नल को 25,000+ पाठक मिल रहे हैं

में अनुक्रमित
  • सूचकांक कॉपरनिकस
  • गूगल ज्ञानी
  • शेरपा रोमियो
  • जेनेमिक्स जर्नलसीक
  • सेफ्टीलिट
  • कृषि में वैश्विक ऑनलाइन अनुसंधान तक पहुंच (अगोरा)
  • सेंटर फॉर एग्रीकल्चर एंड बायोसाइंसेज इंटरनेशनल (CABI)
  • RefSeek
  • हमदर्द विश्वविद्यालय
  • ईबीएससीओ एज़
  • ओसीएलसी- वर्ल्डकैट
  • CABI पूरा पाठ
  • कैब डायरेक्ट
  • पबलोन्स
  • चिकित्सा शिक्षा और अनुसंधान के लिए जिनेवा फाउंडेशन
  • यूरो पब
  • आईसीएमजेई
इस पृष्ठ को साझा करें

अमूर्त

Achievement of Processes of Care for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in General Medical Clinics and Specialist Diabetes Clinics in Thailand

Sokha Sieng, Bandit Thinkamrop and Cameron Hurst

Background: The process of care used for type 2 diabetes are common clinical performance indicators, but comparing achievement of process of care between clinic types at different hospital types has received little attention. This study compares process of diabetes care between specialist diabetes clinics (SDCs) and general medical clinics (GMCs), and how this disparity may vary across hospital types (regional, provincial, community) in Thailand.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study based on medical records of type 2 diabetes patients (n=26,860) collected from 595 hospitals (26 regional, 70 provincial, 499 provincial) between April 1 to June 30, 2012 across all provinces in Thailand. Generalized linear mixed models were used to investigate the association between clinic type and processes of care. Processes of care outcomes included the "FACE of diabetes" where F is foot examination, A is HbA1c examination, C is low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) examination, and E is eye examination. Aggregate measure including All FACE (yes/no), whether all four clinical examinations were achieved, and Any FACE (yes/no), whether any were achieved, were also examined.

Results: SDCs were often better at large hospitals, and only for LDL-C exam were SDCs not superior in this setting. For regional hospitals, SDCs exhibited higher achievement of All FACE (OR regional=1.68, 95%CI: 1.26-2.24). For provincial hospitals, SDCs were associated with higher odds of achieving All FACE and Any FACE (OR=2.14, 95%CI: 1.50-3.06; OR=1.76, 95%CI: 1.05-2.97, respectively). For community hospitals, no difference in achievement of All FACE and Any FACE could be demonstrated between clinics types.

Conclusions: SDCs perform better in process of care (singular or aggregated) than GMCs at regional and provincial hospitals, for all process of care indicators, and were never inferior. However, smaller community hospital- GMCs perform care no worse than their SDCs counterparts.